The Key stone XL Pipeline Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

The Key stone XL Pipeline - Research Paper Example The sponsor of the project is TransCanada who is ready to cater for implementation and performance of the project (Devaney 2011). President Obama rejected the establishment of the XL Pipeline 0n January 18, 2012 by postponing the decision. He was against the idea since the Pipeline will affect people’s underground water supply and Oglala Aquifer. After the president’s decision of rejection, the gas prices rose leading to rise of many protestors who participated in both sides for and against the Pipeline. As TransCanada states, the XL Pipeline would create twenty thousand construction and manufacturing jobs. The consumers are the stakeholders whom this decision made by Barrack Obama affects. This is because they are the one that live near the pipeline. The Oglala tribe is the one whom this decision majorly affects since they are the one who live nearest when compared to other tribes. People in the states advocate for the project since it will open job opportunities to the society around. Opening of job opportunities will lead to development of the areas and improved standards of living to the people around (Devaney 2011). The pipeline would pollute water and air in the area and harm wildlife and birds. This is a critical concern that is worth analyzing critically since environmental pollution should not be encouraged. Pollution of fresh water from household consumption is a crucial issue of concern to the government of the United States since people cannot live without water. Water is an extremely essential commodity that is vital for human survival (Rickert 2011). The decision for and against will have effects to the consumer which might be positive or negative. An ethical dilemma lies where the TransCanada faces the decision on whether to start the project or not. This is a critical area since the decision affects the citizens in the States in either way. Professionals have to analyze the decision that